You are not signed in. Sign in.

Auto Parts War: Find discount auto car parts, used, aftermarket and new.

Other Parts by Makes

Best Prices: Energy Suspension 9.13105G Black HyperFlex Polyurethane Front Tie Rod Dust Boots - Set of 2 » Energy Suspension

Compare prices and find the best price (cheap discount price) of the auto part Energy Suspension 9.13105G Black HyperFlex Polyurethane Front Tie Rod Dust Boots - Set of 2 by the part number 9-13105G, 913105-G, E12913105G, 913105G from a variety of different online car part stores and dealers.

Find Best Prices for This Part »

Part Name: Energy Suspension 9.13105G Black HyperFlex Polyurethane Front Tie Rod Dust Boots - Set of 2
Part Number: 9-13105G, 913105-G, E12913105G, 913105G
Part Brand: Energy Suspension

Part Image / Picture

Energy Suspension 9.13105G Black HyperFlex Polyurethane Front Tie Rod Dust Boots - Set of 2 (9-13105G, 913105-G, E12913105G, 913105G)

Part Description & Details

These black tie rod dust boots resist damage from rocks, sand, water, road salt, and oils better than rubber boots. They help to replace torn and worn-out boots of suspension tie rod ends without needing to replace the entire tie rod. These boots have a 5-point sealing action which prevents the loss of tie rod lubricant and inhibits contamination.

Features:
  • Adds durability to the suspension
  • Resistant to smog, road salt, oil, coolant, and road contaminants
  • Features 5-point sealing action
  • Made of black high performance polyurethane
  • Round shape boots with 0.550 inside diameter and 1.437" base outside diameter

Vehicles & Years

  • 1989-1992 Mazda 626
  • 1988-1992 Mazda MX-6
  • 1979-1981 Mazda RX-7
  • 2006-2006 Mercury Milan
  • 2006-2006 Mercury Montego

 


Browse Other Parts

By Year

By Category

By Make

See the right sidebar.




No comments yet. Submit yours!



Feel free to comment on this one.

We would like to know what you think about this one and publish your thoughts or reviews here! (top)

What say you?

  1. You may optionally give a title for this comment.

  2. Worst to best, 1 to 5, what would you rate this one?

  3. The actual content of your comment. No HTML nor whatsoever allowed.

  4. The author of this comment.

  5. 2 + 4 = ?

    Please answer the question by common sense.