You are not signed in. Sign in.

Auto Parts War: Find discount auto car parts, used, aftermarket and new.

Other Parts by Makes

Best Prices: EBC DP31724C Redstuff Brake Pads for 2004 and up Dodge Magnum 5.7 RT - Front » EBC

Compare prices and find the best price (cheap discount price) of the auto part EBC DP31724C Redstuff Brake Pads for 2004 and up Dodge Magnum 5.7 RT - Front by the part number DP31724C, E35DP31724C from a variety of different online car part stores and dealers.

Find Best Prices for This Part »

Part Name: EBC DP31724C Redstuff Brake Pads for 2004 and up Dodge Magnum 5.7 RT - Front
Part Number: DP31724C, E35DP31724C
Part Brand: EBC

Part Image / Picture

EBC DP31724C Redstuff Brake Pads for 2004 and up Dodge Magnum 5.7 RT - Front (DP31724C, E35DP31724C)

Part Description & Details

(5.7 RT) Built for the (04 and up) Dodge Magnum... Since this material was introduced in late 2003, it has received many positive write ups from performance drivers of faster cars. You can read some of these write ups and comparisons to other performance materials on popular internet forums. This is a truly impressive fast road pad for repeated heavy braking. It emits far less dust than semi-metallic pads and has been proven to stop some vehicles 13 metres quicker than OEM pads from 100mph/160kph.Features EBC Brake-InTM surface coating which conditions rotor surface and accelerates pad bed-in.Nominal friction coefficient 0.5 with approx. 50% dust reduction compared to other pads.

Features:
  • REDSTUFF CHRYSLER

Vehicles & Years

  • 2005-2008 Chrysler 300
  • 2008-2009 Dodge Caliber
  • 2009-2009 Dodge Challenger
  • 2006-2009 Dodge Charger
  • 2005-2008 Dodge Magnum

 


Browse Other Parts

By Year

By Category

By Make

See the right sidebar.




No comments yet. Submit yours!



Feel free to comment on this one.

We would like to know what you think about this one and publish your thoughts or reviews here! (top)

What say you?

  1. You may optionally give a title for this comment.

  2. Worst to best, 1 to 5, what would you rate this one?

  3. The actual content of your comment. No HTML nor whatsoever allowed.

  4. The author of this comment.

  5. 9 + 4 = ?

    Please answer the question by common sense.